We won sovereignty

Arriving in Brussels to meet with colleagues who had questioned Scotland’s independence referendum was a useful moment of reflection. We did not win independence. But we did win the battle for Scottish sovereignty. Never again will it be in doubt that it is the Scottish people who will decide our future. Continue reading

It is not about Labour, the 2015 UK election must be about protecting Scotland from the Tories

Many of the articles which have been written in the aftermath of the independence referendum have been suffused with anger and frustration at the dishonest campaign of fear and smear fronted by the Labour Party. There was probably some value in getting that off our collective chests. But we now need a clear-eyed strategic focus on the future. And we must not fall into the same mistakes which Labour made in 2007 and 2011. Continue reading

A Man’s a Man for A’ That

Robert Burns great poem seemed appropriate for my friend Nabeel Rajab who has just been detained again in Bahrain for comments on Twitter which allegedly, “denigrated government institutions.” No irony that a Government that has shot and killed peaceful protesters, arrested and tortured doctors and human rights defenders and young kids, demolished mosques and engaged in widespread and brutal repression in order to maintain its corrupt and autocratic rule, should think that it is comments on Twitter rather than their own actions which reflect badly on them. Honest men and women look and laugh at that.

And also for our friend Abdulhadi Alkhawaja who is serving life in prison because he is indeed, a “man o’ independent mind.” Continue reading

ISIS, Saudi Arabia and laser guided stupidity

In the 1980s the US and the UK encouraged Saudi Arabia to support the armed opposition to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. The US and UK had earlier entered into a Faustian pact with the Saudi regime. In order to secure access to oil, the Western powers agreed to turn a blind eye to the corruption, brutality and misogyny of the ruling house of Saud. The poor Westerners had delusions they could guide their protegés. Continue reading

Purpose and process and daring to hope again

What do we want? Independence was partly about democracy and self-respect, but it was also about building a better, fairer Scotland, that gave equal opportunity to our young, and looked after our vulnerable. We lost the referendum, but we must not lose our focus on building a better future. We must use the current powers of the Scottish Parliament to more effectively reduce poverty and inequality. Amongst other things we should also pursue serious land reform and give renewed focus to community owned renewable energy. We must also engage in the discussion on further powers, and press constructively for whatever we can use to start to build the better Scotland that is our purpose. Continue reading

Heartbroken but unbowed

We have been defeated and it is hard to take, but the result was clear and we need to respect the decision of the Scottish people. We should celebrate the high turnout and the extraordinary, vibrant, creative movement that came together in support of independence. There has been a huge investment and engagement in hopes of building a better fairer Scotland and we need to try and sustain that in spite of the result. Continue reading

Dodgy Business

Business leaders are entitled to their opinion, whether they are paid up Tories, or whether they just visited Cameron in Downing Street out of curiosity. But we know the kind of political opinions business leaders, with some noble exceptions, tend to have. They mostly opposed the introduction of a minimum wage with warnings of cataclysm. Many opposed equal pay legislation and continue to oppose workers rights. I once saw a poster in the US that said, “organised labor, the people who brought you the weekend.” Business leaders resisted such changes each step of the way. Continue reading

More than twice as much for No on BBC News at Six

A quick analysis of the first 13 minutes and 40 seconds of the BBC News at Six on Wednesday 10th September had 48 seconds of Yes voices and 102 seconds of No voices. In addition there was 41 seconds of description/commentary which could be seen as Yes supportive and 141 seconds of description/commentary that was No supportive. There was a further 423 seconds of reporting which could be defined as broadly neutral and 65 seconds of non referendum reporting. Overall there was 89 seconds pro Yes, 243 seconds pro No and 423 seconds neutral. There was more than twice as much coverage of direct No comments than Yes. And the Yes comment includes Alex Salmond responding to a critical question from Nick Robinson. None of the No spokespersons were asked a critical question. (see breakdown below) Continue reading

Don’t panic, the White Heather Club to the rescue

There is a long way to go, and there may well be a few twists and turns before we count the votes, but the last 48 hours in Scottish and UK politics has been quite remarkable. The trigger has been the opinion polls catching up with the shift in the mood of Scottish voters. Continue reading

Can we love Better Together?

Better Together have announced that they love their families more than we do, but the real question is whether we can love Better Together.

I was in Chile in 1988 a few months before the referendum which signalled the end of Pinochet’s dictatorship. One of the surprising things for me, as we met with the youth organizations of all the political parties, from Communist to Christian Democrat, was how much they were concerned with the one third of Chileans who supported Pinochet. Continue reading